<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Javascript performance &#8211; writing to innerHTML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.mahesha.com/2007/07/05/javascript-performance-writing-to-innerhtml/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.mahesha.com/2007/07/05/javascript-performance-writing-to-innerhtml/</link>
	<description>Technology in day to day life...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:33:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahesh Asolkar</title>
		<link>http://tech.mahesha.com/2007/07/05/javascript-performance-writing-to-innerhtml/comment-page-1/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahesh Asolkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.mahesha.com/2007/07/05/javascript-performance-writing-to-innerhtml/#comment-564</guid>
		<description>egor4eg, thanks for the input. I&#039;ll sure try it out. 
 
I wrote the AJAX experiment a while back, when I was unaware of jQuery. If I rewrite it, I&#039;d probably use jQuery. jQuery has made my recent work very fast to implement, efficient in execution, easily compatible across most browsers. 
 
But the experiments without jQuery were educational, and necessary to appreciate the value of libraries like jQuery! 
My recent post &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/github.com\/asolkar\/emptyem\/commit\/818fc2cc52a88d690b831cbea1d33a1c27e17252&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Updated preferences screenshot&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>egor4eg, thanks for the input. I&#039;ll sure try it out. </p>
<p>I wrote the AJAX experiment a while back, when I was unaware of jQuery. If I rewrite it, I&#039;d probably use jQuery. jQuery has made my recent work very fast to implement, efficient in execution, easily compatible across most browsers. </p>
<p>But the experiments without jQuery were educational, and necessary to appreciate the value of libraries like jQuery!<br />
My recent post <a href="http:\/\/github.com\/asolkar\/emptyem\/commit\/818fc2cc52a88d690b831cbea1d33a1c27e17252" target="_blank">Updated preferences screenshot</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egor4eg</title>
		<link>http://tech.mahesha.com/2007/07/05/javascript-performance-writing-to-innerhtml/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>egor4eg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.mahesha.com/2007/07/05/javascript-performance-writing-to-innerhtml/#comment-563</guid>
		<description>create array and create string using array.push() method. It is much quicker than += string concatenation in IE6 and IE7. So, use something like: var html_str = new Arrray(); html_str.push(&quot; 
&lt;LI class=&quot;); 
html_str.push(it_li_class); 
 
this.port.innerHTML = html_str; 
....... 
html_str.push(&quot; a &lt;&gt;&quot;);&lt;/li&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>create array and create string using array.push() method. It is much quicker than += string concatenation in IE6 and IE7. So, use something like: var html_str = new Arrray(); html_str.push(&quot;<br />
&lt;LI class=&quot;);<br />
html_str.push(it_li_class); </p>
<p>this.port.innerHTML = html_str;<br />
&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
html_str.push(&quot; a &lt;&gt;&quot;);</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
